SICK TO DEATH

How language programs people to fail

One in fourteen working-age Britons is out of work through long-term sickness, behind a door that demands they stay that way. This paper is about that door: the stories it makes people tell, what those stories do to a brain and a body, and what a different door would cost. Less than you think.

2.8 million
people out of work through long-term sickness: one working-age person in every fourteen, a record.
More than half
of them are aged 50 to 64: the last stretch of a working life, with the pension out of reach.
Two in three
refused claims are overturned at tribunal, where the rules are identical but a person can simply talk.
£212 billion
a year: the cost of health-related economic inactivity. Roughly seven per cent of GDP.
91 million
antidepressant prescriptions dispensed in England in a single year, the highest total on record.
£65bn ≈ £62.7bn
a participation income at pilot rates for the whole caseload, next to what the current system already spends.

The idea

To receive help in Britain today, 2.8 million people must repeatedly describe themselves as broken: on forms, in assessments, at tribunals, indefinitely. Psychology is clear that we become the stories we practise. The system is paying its largest caseload to rehearse its own sickness, and then acting surprised when the caseload grows.

This paper proposes a different door: replace the incapacity assessment maze with a participation income. A secure floor, no test of brokenness attached, carrying an invitation of around five hours a week of contribution, defined as generously as life itself. Art counts. Care counts. A tended riverbank counts. Nobody audits the hours. Nobody in work can quit into it. And nobody, ever again, has to keep saying the words I am sick, I am broken, it hurts in order to eat.

I make. I create. I take part.

Read the paper